Ryzen 7 9800x3D vs Ryzen 7 7800x3D: +8% Performance and $30 more

Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the new top CPU for gaming

4 min. read

Published onNovember 7, 2024

published onNovember 7, 2024

Share this article

Improve this guide

Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help Windows Report sustain the editorial teamRead more

Recently, AMD launched the flagship CPU Ryzen 7 9800X3D, so if you want to know how it compares to the previous Ryzen 7 7800X3D, we’re going to highlight all the specs and differences between them.

AMD claims that the new Ryzen 7 9800X3D has 8% higher gaming performance, is 15% more profficient in multi-threading apps compared to the older Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU. However, it’s only $30 more expensive, available at$480 on Amazon. We also have full reviews onRyzen 7 7800X3DandRyzen 7 9800X3Dif you want to learn more about the CPUs.

Ryzen 7 9800x3D vs Ryzen 7 7800x3D comparison

1. Technical specifications

As usual, we will start by showing the technical specifications of both CPUs side by side, just to have a quick view at the differences between the two:

2. Key differences between Ryzen 7 9800x3D and Ryzen 7 7800x3D

Zen 5 vs Zen 4 architecture

Obviously, the most important difference between Ryzen 7 9800x3D and Ryzen 7 7800x3D is that the latest CPU is designed with Zen 5 architecture on 4 nm while the older CPU is built on the Zen 4 architecture (5nm and 4nm)

According to AMD,Improvements include Improved branch prediction accuracy and latency; higher throughput with wider pipelines and vectors; and deeper window size across design for more parallelism. As a result, single-threaded IPC is increased by about ~16% gen-over-gen.

Base and boost clock speeds

Also, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU offers higher base and boost clock speeds, which translates to better overall performance, especially in gaming. However, both chips comes with the 3D V-Cache technology with a whooping 96 MB of L3 cache that really mages a huge difference when compared to the latest Intel CPUs.

Memory speed

Another notable difference, while not decisive, is that Ryzen 7 9800X3D can work with faster DDR5 memory (DDR5-5600 vs DDR5-5200), which, obviously, translates into higher performance in memory-intensive applications.

Power consumption

When comparing the power consumption, during intensive tasks like the Cinebench multi-core tests, AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D consumes around 128W higher than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. In contrast, the 7800X3D has a TDP of 120W but typically operates closer to 88W during normal use. So, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is more power efficient, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivers higher performance.

3. Gaming performance comparison

When comparing the gaming performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the 9800X3D clearly offers better FPS due to its higher clock speeds and improved architecture.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D typically provides around 4-6 FPS more on average compared to the 7800X3D. It also improves minimum FPS by about 6 FPS, which helps in maintaining smoother gameplay, especially in demanding titles.

However, both CPUs proved to be a lot better for gaming than the latest Intel Core CPUs.

Conclusion

Obviously, Ryzen 7 9800x3D tops Ryzen 7 7800x3D in gaming performance and it is only $30 more expensive than the older model. On the other hand, Ryzen 7 7800x3D’s price has risen together with its growing popularity and that might also happen with the new Ryzen 7 9800x3D. So, if you if you want to build a gaming rig now, you should definitely grab Ryzen 7 9800x3D while you can still find it on the shelves.

On the other hand, AMD is expected to launch the new dual-CCD X3D chips soon which the company advertises with higher specs and performance. Decisions, decisions…

Let us know about your thoughts on the two AMD chips and if you plan on getting any of them in the comments below.

Ryzen 7 9800x3D vs Ryzen 7 7800x3D: +8% Performance and $30 more#

Ryzen 7 9800x3D vs Ryzen 7 7800x3D comparison#

1. Technical specifications#

2. Key differences between Ryzen 7 9800x3D and Ryzen 7 7800x3D#

3. Gaming performance comparison#

Conclusion#